pece_annotation_1473634164
josh.correiraAnnotation of
In response to
The report was published by L'institut de hautes études internationales et du développement on revues.org
pece_annotation_1473634175
josh.correiraAnnotation of
The report is written by Doctors Without Borders (Médecin sans Frontières)
pece_annotation_1473634184
josh.correiraAnnotation of
In response to
This report is written following an apparent “failure” in the disaster response following the 2010 Haiti earthquake
pece_annotation_1473634196
josh.correiraAnnotation of
In response to
The report consists of the main article followed by a response from Andrea Binder of the Global Public Policy Institute.
pece_annotation_1473634206
josh.correiraAnnotation of
In response to
The data for this report was obtained over a period from the earthquake in 2010 to 2012.
pece_annotation_1473634217
josh.correiraAnnotation of
In response to
The report addresses disaster and health in how it describes actors' emergency response to the initial disaster as adequate but states the aid supplied does not allow progress to occur. The victims of the disaster were given temporary shelter in tents, but many still live in tents at the time of this report being written. These conditions led to a cholera outbreak which the actors did not seem to care about or provide aid for.
pece_annotation_1473634230
josh.correiraAnnotation of
The report states that funding is passed down from the top while reports are passed up from the bottom leading to a lot of dysfunction in the chain of aid, especially for technical professionals an the bottom of the chain.
pece_annotation_1473634245
josh.correiraAnnotation of
The report has been cited by many other articles and reports including ones published by the NIH
pece_annotation_1473634401
josh.correiraAnnotation of
The MSPP has announced a plan to eradicate the cholera outbreak within 10 years which was backed by the CDC however the report believes it is an empty promise believing they still do not realize the true issue.
pece_annotation_1517276782
rramosAnnotation of
In response to
In the article, the authors used data from the 2011-2015 American Community 5-Year Estimates by the U.S. Census, 2010 U.S Census, and George C. Galster, “The Mechanism(s) of Neighborhood Effects: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications.”. They looked at data follwing children under 18, and followed poverty trends such as census tracts for concentrated areas of high poverty. They used the number of children in Essex County Cities and compared it to the the amount of children in poverty in those cities, for the years of 2000 and 2015. Henceforth, they created an arguement stating that Child Poverty rates have risen within those 15 years, and even by 50% in some areas. The only issue I have with some of this data is that in some cities, we see a decrease in child population - and while there is an increase in child poverty in those areas, I feel like the reduced number of children in that area plays a big part in the so called "Increased Child Poverty Rates".