Skip to main content

Main navigation

Home
About
Collaborate
Analyze
Discover

User account menu

Log in

User account menu

Log in

Search

User account menu

Log in

Analyze

essential2life1

lucypei

In response to

What does this text say about ways CSR has continually reconfigured since the 1950s?

Denial → {Bhopal} → stewardship → Disavowal

Choose focus for analysis

Annotation (1)

Contributor

People who added this content and can edit it.

lucypei (1)

Annotated artifact type

Show annotations that have been made on artifacts of the selected content types.

Artifact - PDF Document (1)

Annotated artifact

Show annotations that have been made on the selected artifacts.

Kim Fortun 2009 Essential2life (1)
Kim Fortun 2001 Green Consulting (ch 11 from Advocacy after Bhopal) (1)
Leigh Campoamor 2019 There's An App For That (1)
Dinah Rajak 2011 Theatres of Virtue (1)
Nora Kenworthy 2014 A Manufactu(RED) Ethics (1)
Allison Loconto 2014 Sustaining An Enterprise (1)
Marina Welker 2009 "Corporate Security Begins in the Community" (1)
Raman 2007 Community - Coca-Cola Interface (1)
Austin Lord 2016 Citizens of a Hydropower Nation (1)
Sally Babidge 2015 The Problem With ’Transparency’ (1)
In the Shadow of Ebola (0)

Analytic (Question)

What parts of the film were you not compelled or convinced by? Why?
What is the central argument or narrative of the film?
How is the argument or narrative made and sustained? How much scientific information is provided, for example? Does the film have emotional appeal?
What stakeholders are described or portrayed in the film, what were their experiences, and what kinds of decisions did they have to grapple with before, during, and in the aftermath of disaster?
How, if at all, are emergency responders portrayed in the film?
What parts of the film did you find most persuasive and compelling? Why?
What audiences does the film best address? Why?
What perspectives or viewpoints are not included in this film?
What could have been added to this film to enhance its educational value?
What kinds of action and points of intervention are suggested by the film? If the film itself does not suggest corrective action, describe actions that you can imagine being effective.
What three points, details or references from the film did you follow up on to learn more? Write short descriptions of what you learned in your search, providing citations.
What two (or more) quotes capture the message of the article?
How did the author of the article conduct their research?
What is the main point of the article, and how is it supported?
What actors (individuals or organizations) are referred to? (Provide names and short descriptions)
How does the article address public health inequities or emergency response?
What three points, details or references from the article did you follow up on to advance your understanding of the issues and actors described in the article?
How to control the damage or worse situation after the disaster?
What does this text say about ways CSR has continually reconfigured since the 1950s?
What does this text say about ways CSR initiatives position corporations as governance actors -- with the authority and mandate to shape conditions for (what counts as) democratic order, prosperity, the social contract, etc?
What does this text say about ways CSR initiatives define and enact "the ethical" and "responsibility"?
What does this text say about ways corporate actors see CSR initiatives as "helpful," especially to a marginalized Other?
What does this text say about strategies - discursive, social, scientific, political economic, etc -corporations use to convey their responsibility, ethical standing and contributions to the social good?
What does this text say about foreclosures caused by CSR initiatives?

Powered by Drupal