Analyze

Linking messages of community pride with political opposition to intrusion by petrochemical companies has interesting implications for collaborations across communities. Does this message enable partnerships in other regions and nations, and what is its relationship to the not-in-my-backyard/NIMBY mentality? How may it be interpreted in differing cultural and language contexts? 

This app is named I’ve-Been-Violated, and it is made by an organization called We-Consent.

I guess, no one.

The app cannot be development. The app’s concept miss the most important part that consider the human emotion and reaction in the actual situation. The point for offering evidence on court is okay, but the way that open an app and recording after a rape is pretty bad. This app is created only for a shallow idea, but not consider all the elements for the app to help victim of sexual assault. It is awful app, and the most suitable way is correct positive value, respect and old-fashion empathy.

This app’s function is offer victim of sexual assault find a safe place and to record evidence, such as video and audio of an incident. Use these recoding as evidence. The app save the location of the user and stored the information offline.

Geo-coding technology support the app to get the location of the user when using the app. Double-encrypted to save the information.

Another app of We-Consent is “records student agreeing to sexual activity”. It is terrible as well, it within an implied effect.

The app encrypted the information and stored offline.

This app is bad to use. There is a people write on the app customer review shows there is also an age limit saying 17+. This customer is a rape survivor and she/he think this app is awful and the app should be removed.

The apps were created for individuals who are consenting to sex, revoking consent for sex, or documenting an assault. There was a need (from someone) for such apps to be created, though I'm not entirely sure how this need was assessed.