Skip to main content

Main navigation

Home
About
Collaborate
Analyze
Discover

User account menu

Log in

User account menu

Log in

Search

User account menu

Log in

Analyze

J_Adams: CARB Funding

jradams1

Annotation of

California Air Resources Board (CARB)

In response to

How is this organization funded today?

CARB is funded by the State of California.

Choose focus for analysis

Annotation (1)

Contributor

People who added this content and can edit it.

nebeck (10)
michael.lee (4)
Lauren (3)
Zackery.White (2)
Andreas_Rebmann (1)
ciera.williams (1)
tamar.rogoszinski (1)
erin_tuttle (1)
wolmad (1)
seanw146 (1)
Sara_Nesheiwat (1)
Alexi Martin (1)
maryclare.crochiere (1)
Sara.Till (1)
xiaox (1)
harrison.leinweber (1)
a_chen (1)
josh.correira (1)
jaostrander (1)
rumil.rana (1)
jradams1 (1)
ntanio (1)
bmvuong (1)
mtebbe (1)
annlejan7 (1)
kgupta (0)

Annotated artifact type

Show annotations that have been made on artifacts of the selected content types.

Artifact - Website (1)

Annotated artifact

Show annotations that have been made on the selected artifacts.

California Air Resources Board (CARB) (1)

Analytic (Question)

META: How are energy imaginaries—motivations, rationalities, methods, means, scales, etc.—being expressed, deliberated, and debated during COVID-19? What new forms of expression have these discourses engendered?
What initiatives (research, activism, education, etc.) are illustrative of this organization’s work?
What have you learned about anthropocenics in this place?
What is there to report from the Austin Energy Transition project?
MICRO 1: How is energy research, planning, and development being carried out or resisted during COVID-19? How are COVID-19 policies and practices preventing access to energy assistance, which is needed ever more given decreased incomes?
What is the main argument, narrative and effect of this text? What evidence and examples support these?
META: How is “the Anthropocene” – by this, or some other name – talked and worried about in this setting? What modes of communication carry and occlude engagement with anthropocenics? What discursive histories shape contemporary articulations?
GEO: How has this site’s energy system marked, transmuted, destabilized and harmed this setting? How, where, and what kind of traces of this harm are being observed, recorded, mitigated/exacerbated?
What scales, systems, and/or objects of study does this text point to as important for understanding this Field Campus as a site of the Quotidian Anthropocene?
DEUTERO: What conceptual apparatuses and habits, modes of collectivity and economy scaffold (or undercut) reflexive reconsideration of how energy is being thought and talked about during COVID-19?
MACRO 1: What economic activities and interests have and continue to shape energy planning and practice in the midst of COVID-19? How has COVID-19’s impact on different energy systems influenced the way future economies are being imagined and planned?
MACRO 2: What laws and policy have addressed COVID-19’s impacts on energy production, distribution, and consumption? How have they caused different scales of sovereignties (federal, state, municipal, etc.) to intersect, overlap, and resist each other?
NANO 1: What thought styles, semiotic ideologies, and phenomenologies are in play in imagining and responding to the impacts of COVID-19 on energy systems, energy use, and knowledge of energy?
What quotes from this text are exemplary or particularly evocative?
1. What is the setting of this case? What are its assets? What opportunities and challenges will there be in this setting in coming years?
What is the stated mission this organization today? How is the organization's mission explained (on its website, in public meetings, by individuals, etc)?
What is this organization's structure today? Who works in or is a member of this organization?
What events (internal and external) or data have had a significant impact on the evolution of the organization?
How is this organization funded today?
What kind of data and research does this organization produce and share? How does the organization evaluate and monitor the credibility of the information it uses and circulates?
Analyze the artifact
MACRO: What economic activities have contributed to anthropocenics in this setting? How are future economies imagined and planned? What laws and policy have addressed anthropocenics?
GEO: How has intensive human activity marked, transmuted, destabilized and harmed this setting? What levels of lead and other metals are in the soil? Where are hazardous waste stored?
If you will participate in the call, provide a link to your profile in our digital platform.
If you participated in the St. Louis Field Campus, what feedback do you have? What components were most interesting and productive for you? What suggestions do you have for future field campuses?
How do you want to participate in the River School Open Seminar over the next six months (leading to another Field Campus and presentation of our work at the annual meeting of the Social Studies of Science in New Orleans)?
ECO-ATMO: What is considered to “count” as an environmental problem (as opposed to a social/political problem)? What ecosystems in this setting are depended on, protected, or compromised, and how is this recognized (or not)?
MACRO: What economic activities have and continue to shape energy transition planning and practice in this setting? How do sovereignties (federal, state, municipal) intersect, overlap, and resist each other?
MESO: What forms of political organization and have been developed in order to plan and manage this site’s energy system and energy transition? How do these organizations relate to each other?
BIO: How are bodies (human and non-human) in this setting differentially laced and burdened with the costs of this site’s current energy system and/or practices of energy transition? (How) Are these embodied inequalities naturalized or politicized?
TECHNO: What technology does this site’s current energy-system infrastructure consist of? How does it function, and dysfunction? What sorts of energy-related problems are imagined to be in/solvable with or through the development of new technologies?
DATA: How do various stakeholders understand the proper conduct for producing and interpreting data to plan and guide energy transition? What data infrastructures have been developed, are being developed, or are perceived as necessary?
EXDU: What roles have the different practices, venues, programs, levels, and institutions of education (formal and informal) played in shaping how local stakeholders think about and practice energy transition?
How can this text contribute to our thinking about the purpose and design of QA Field Campuses (understood as knowledge infrastructure tuned to the Anthropocene)?
What interesting concepts or analytical frames does this text put forward? How might you repurpose or reformulate them to guide your analysis of this Field Campus as a site of the Quotidian Anthropocene?
Where are you situated as COVID-19 plays out? What backstories shape your engagement with COVID-19? How can you be contacted? What questions and settings are you especially interested in following?
How is the aftermath of COVID-19 crisis being imagined in different settings? How is this shaping beliefs, practices, and policies?
How should this text be cited? What is notable about the place or time of its publication? What related texts have been published in the same journal, book or book series?
What are the author/s’ institutional and disciplinary positions, intellectual backgrounds and scholarly scope?
What is the main argument, narrative and effect of this text? What evidence and examples support these?
What quotes from this text are exemplary or particularly evocative?
Where and how has this text been referenced or discussed?
When and where was this text published? What intellectual-discursive | socio-cultural | political-economic currents provoked and shaped its writing?
What does this text suggest for thinking about toxicity?
What does this text suggest for thinking about and responding to Quotidian Anthropocenes?
What does this text suggest for thinking about and responding to the COVID-19 disaster?
What insights from postcolonial studies seem especially relevant in contemporary, cultural analysis -- inevitably shaped by if not directly focused on the COVID-19 pandemic?
NANO 2: What data, forms of analysis, emergent practices, and modes of expression are persuasive and consequential here?
BIO: How do energy systems impact abilities to avoid or fight off COVID-19 infections? How have COVID-related disruptions/responses to energy systems impacted other bodily vulnerabilities? How are these embodied inequalities being perceived/discussed?
EXDU 1: How have different programs/institutions of education influenced conceptions of the intersection between energy-system management and disease control? Do shifts in household energy conditions force residents to rethink/learn about energy systems?
How are people reimagining what is needed and possible in the wake of COVID-19, protests against police brutality and anti-blackness, and other, compounding developments?
How is anti-Blackness compounding with COVID-19 in different settings?
What questions do you have for the author?
What digital tools do you already use in your research?
As COVID-19 has continued to unfold, what research questions have you come to see as especially important? How have you imagined working on them? Would you appreciate collaborators?
If you have been working in a research group within the broader research collective, what has been your focus and work process? How have you imagined sharing your work with the broader research collective? Are you open to new members in your group?
Are you interested in building digital collections of material related to your research interests, potentially inviting others in the group to look at them with you? What digital collections have you started or envis
If you are interested in participating in (Zoom) Collaboration Calls, will Fridays, 6am PT work for you? Should calls be monthly, or twice a month? Other suggestions?
Would you like to present work or host all or part of a call when we reconvene in September?
What questions and frustrations does this text leave you with?
How will your own research build from, counter and compare with this text?
What concepts does this text build from and advance?
2. What environmental hazards are there in this setting, what is their source and what are their effects on the environment, health and inclusive prosperity?
3. What intersecting factors -- social, cultural, political, technological, ecological -- contribute to environmental health vulnerability and injustice in this setting? What has produced historic disadvantage?
What is the latest update for this search log?
How is this image relevant to your research?
How does work by this organization currently or potentially advance justice and good governance?
What expertise, capacities, and skills do we need in the EcoGovLab?
What do you hope to get out of the lab?
When was the organization founded, what was the founding purpose, what were its modes of support, and what was its early structure?

Powered by Drupal