9. What kinds of data and research would be useful in efforts to characterize and address environmental threats in this setting and similar settings? EiJ Case Study Framework
10. What intersecting injustices -- data, economic, epistemic, gender, health, infrastructure, intergenerational, media, procedural, racial, reproductive -- contribute to environmental injustice in this setting? EiJ Case Study Framework
6. How have environmental problems in this setting been reported on by media, environmental groups, companies and government agencies? Where has there been data divergence? EiJ Case Study Framework
5. What have different stakeholder groups done (or not done) in response to the problems in this setting? EiJ Case Study Framework
3. What intersecting factors -- social, cultural, political, technological, ecological -- contribute to environmental health vulnerability and injustice in this setting? What has produced historic disadvantage? EiJ Case Study Framework
2. What environmental hazards are there in this setting, what is their source and what are their effects on the environment, health and inclusive prosperity? EiJ Case Study Framework
1. What is the setting of this case? What are its assets? What opportunities and challenges will there be in this setting in coming years? EiJ Case Study Framework
4. Who are stakeholders, what are their characteristics, and what are their perceptions of the problems? EiJ Case Study Framework
7. What local actions would reduce environmental vulnerability and injustice in this setting? EiJ Case Study Framework
8. What extra-local actions (at state, national or international levels) would reduce environmental vulnerability and injustice in this setting and similar settings? EiJ Case Study Framework
