9. What kinds of data and research would be useful in efforts to characterize and address environmental threats in this setting and similar settings? EiJ Case Study Framework
How does this ethnographic archive relate to or compare to the archive for your own research? Bremen Workshop: Gröpelingen Questions
What research topics would be relevant and worthwhile to further pursue in Gröpelingen based on our preliminary data walk? Bremen Workshop: Gröpelingen Questions
What dominant topics and narratives does our collaborative “data walk” produce? What stays invisible? Bremen Workshop: Gröpelingen Questions
How are social and cultural issues interlinked with questions of ecological problems and transformation in this specific urban neighborhood? Bremen Workshop: Gröpelingen Questions
How have social and ecological problems in Gröpelingen been reported on by the media, civil society organizations, city agencies and so forth. How do their perspectives differ? What data divergence can be observed? Bremen Workshop: Gröpelingen Questions
10. What intersecting injustices -- data, economic, epistemic, gender, health, infrastructure, intergenerational, media, procedural, racial, reproductive -- contribute to environmental injustice in this setting? EiJ Case Study Framework
6. How have environmental problems in this setting been reported on by media, environmental groups, companies and government agencies? Where has there been data divergence? EiJ Case Study Framework
5. What have different stakeholder groups done (or not done) in response to the problems in this setting? EiJ Case Study Framework
3. What intersecting factors -- social, cultural, political, technological, ecological -- contribute to environmental health vulnerability and injustice in this setting? What has produced historic disadvantage? EiJ Case Study Framework
