pece_annotation_1472865624
Alexi MartinAnnotation of
The viewpoints that are not included in this film were the people who may have been affected by the radiation either in Toyoko or the rest of Japan.
pece_annotation_1473780914
wolmadAnnotation of
Perspectives of public health officials, goverment workers (excluding the president), and international aid organizations such as doctors with out borders and the united nations (both of which are depicted), are not included in the film. More scholarly perspectives are also not included.
pece_annotation_1473871376
erin_tuttleAnnotation of
The film primarily included the viewpoints of a family separated due to the Ebola outbreak, from both the affected Monrovia and the safety of the United States. The views of aid workers, advocates, patients, and doctors, government officials or health experts were not included.
pece_annotation_1473994514
tamar.rogoszinskiAnnotation of
This film does not show the perspective of the government in all of this at all.
pece_annotation_1474153062
Sara_NesheiwatAnnotation of
I would say that the perspectives of the government as well as first responders were not included in this film. They were not able to communicate the stresses as well as the lack of resources and man power. There were no viewpoints from first responders or volunteers, having that testimony would have more accurately depicted the hardships that first responders and aid were facing.
pece_annotation_1474239321
seanw146Annotation of
There were a few notable viewpoints that were not included. First, those on the international level, but also the doctors and those managing the outbreak (other than the one Ebola response member that was interviewed).
pece_annotation_1474834697
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
They did not include the viewpoint of fire fighters in this film, who were also important in the response to this disaster.
pece_annotation_1474926524
maryclare.crochiereAnnotation of
The government and politicians that released the information do not share their defense of why they cut information out, at the cost of the people and responders.
pece_annotation_1475352679
ciera.williamsAnnotation of
The film doesn't look much at the people's experience with MSF. There are no interviews of the patient's themsleves. The film touches on the local health officials' opinons, but not much on the actual patients'. It doesn't highlight their sturggles as much as I believe it should.
pece_annotation_1475441872
a_chenAnnotation of
The film has not included the patient’s viewpoint or the locals’ viewpoints within this kind of situations. This might due to the communication difficulties with the language. If the audience viewed the content with locals’ viewpoint might benefit from knowing the cultural practices and plan for the future interaction more carefully.