pece_annotation_1475372482
xiaoxAnnotation of
It might be can descript the feelings of doctors and people when they faced leaving or project ending. The improvement of the area that MSF helped.
pece_annotation_1475441828
a_chenAnnotation of
Emergency responders are the MSF members in this film, they have to continue serve millions of patients with the lack of medical supplies and the worse medical conditions over the place. They have to deal with the communication difficulties and the uncooperative patients with the lack of understanding to their own health. Furthermore, they have to make decision of which patient gets help and serve. As they concluded in the film with one of the discussion they had, there is no ideal environment (situation) to plan and perform an ideal operation (surgery) in such places (~49:00 – 51:00).
pece_annotation_1475441884
a_chenAnnotation of
Some scientific data/information or relevant organizations’ site can be added as captions within the film, so the audience can have reference to research after watching the film.
pece_annotation_1475372156
xiaoxAnnotation of
The film show MSF daily life, and difficulties they meet. As well as the personal narrative reveals their inner thoughts and emotions. There are some scientific information is provided. For example, Dr Tom Krueger doing an operation for a man who was shot on the head, and the description of the situation within scientific information. The film have emotional appeal which are struggle, sad and complexity. The music of the film and each characters’ emotions are revealed.
pece_annotation_1475372390
xiaoxAnnotation of
In response to
The people who are try to be a MSF, and organisations that can help offer more resources for helping people. In addition, any people can help and support, people who concentrate the neglected problem in the world.
pece_annotation_1475441818
a_chenAnnotation of
Stakeholders with this film could be doctors, international-wide medical and health services or professionals studied within the field of health conditions in the third-world countries. The MSF members (doctors) are the first person who get into contact with the locals, they would experience a range of situations with during and aftermath of the disaster. They have focused on the practical side of the medical service with contrast to the United Nation, UNICEF only planned the theoretical plans with meetings that MSF would said that are not suitable with the situations they have faced (~49:00 – 51:00). After the mission the MSF member served, each one of them have decided the future paths which assist the development of medical health within these areas in some ways. Professionals interesting in this field might benefit from the film fieldtrip recording and gain relevant research based on the situations described in the film in order to plan a possible solution to current situations or make plan for the future possible situation to prevent lack of medical service within third world countries and increase overall public health.
pece_annotation_1475441872
a_chenAnnotation of
The film has not included the patient’s viewpoint or the locals’ viewpoints within this kind of situations. This might due to the communication difficulties with the language. If the audience viewed the content with locals’ viewpoint might benefit from knowing the cultural practices and plan for the future interaction more carefully.
pece_annotation_1475372094
xiaoxAnnotation of
In response to
The central narrative of the film is MSF encountered pain, panic, struggle, life and death in Democratic Republic of Congo and Liberia. MSF figure out doubts and faith in limit resource and poor environment conditions.
pece_annotation_1475372293
xiaoxAnnotation of
The film is impressed and there is no any parts are not compelled. I believe it is all true, and happening in the world.
pece_annotation_1475441807
a_chenAnnotation of
The argument has mainly shown through the discussion and meetings among the MSF members with their personal emotive expression towards the current situations or the decision makings. Other than the group meetings, the interview with each individual MFS member is also expressed emotionally with his/her own thoughts (e.g. ~11:00 Kiara inspected the patient and made a range of assumptions towards the illness, “…this could be a yellow fever”). Scientific information might carry out via their personal medical experience opinions but not specifically noted with any data or text to the audience watches the film. Also their opinion needs to translate to the locals, so the phrases used in that context is also not very scientific which makes everything can be understand by parties easily.