Search

Linking messages of community pride with political opposition to intrusion by petrochemical companies has interesting implications for collaborations across communities. Does this message enable partnerships in other regions and nations, and what is its relationship to the not-in-my-backyard/NIMBY mentality? How may it be interpreted in differing cultural and language contexts? 

The report was published by L'institut de hautes études internationales et du développement on revues.org

The report is written by Doctors Without Borders (Médecin sans Frontières)

This report is written following an apparent “failure” in the disaster response following the 2010 Haiti earthquake

The report consists of the main article followed by a response from Andrea Binder of the Global Public Policy Institute.

The data for this report was obtained over a period from the earthquake in 2010 to 2012.

The report addresses disaster and health in how it describes actors' emergency response to the initial disaster as adequate but states the aid supplied does not allow progress to occur. The victims of the disaster were given temporary shelter in tents, but many still live in tents at the time of this report being written. These conditions led to a cholera outbreak which the actors did not seem to care about or provide aid for.

The report states that funding is passed down from the top while reports are passed up from the bottom leading to a lot of dysfunction in the chain of aid, especially for technical professionals an the bottom of the chain.

The report has been cited by many other articles and reports including ones published by the NIH

The MSPP has announced a plan to eradicate the cholera outbreak within 10 years which was backed by the CDC however the report believes it is an empty promise believing they still do not realize the true issue.