pece_annotation_1476634087
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
In response to
The policy defines what an Institute for Mental Disorders is and and payment exclusions for those under medicaid (<21 or 22 y/o or >65 y/o).
pece_annotation_1476634685
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
Vulnerable populations for mental health issues seem to be covered by pay exclusion. Those younger than 21 or 22 are included, which appear to be the most at-risk for mental illness.
pece_annotation_1476634502
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
In response to
It defines and provides provisions for Intitutes of Mental Disorders where public mental health would be addressed. It also allows for pay exclusion to those of certain ages, allowing for more treatment to those that may be more at-risk.
pece_annotation_1476634433
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
In response to
It appears that is is an expanded version of the document created orginally in order to facilitate changes in the treatment of mental health and better define what an IMD needs and is.
pece_annotation_1476634336
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
This is a calfornia department of health document, therefore it appears to apply specifically to that states definition of an IMD.
pece_annotation_1476634989
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
In response to
It defines where we would take psych transports. Otherwise it does not directly address first responders.
pece_annotation_1476634275
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
In response to
I really don't know how to find this information. I can update this after asking you about it tomorrow.
pece_annotation_1476634774
Andreas_RebmannAnnotation of
I could barely find anything on this in particular. In general, there have been more and more support for a stronger mental health system in the United States and while this policy furthers development, some people believe that there is much more that is needed.