This project will examine how trans activism in Southern California benefiting certain groups of transgender individuals might create new marginality and vulnerability for other groups of transgend
These are the bibliographies of this essay.
Project Title Slide
These are the events of particular importance to this project, from both an etic and emic perspective.
This is a critical analysis of the interacting hegemonies shaping the ground on which this project will be based.
These are types of data to be collected during this study.
These are research questions of the study and interview questions to be asked during interviews with professionals.
The main argument is that the cultural translation of a patient’s history is a very complex and difficult process, and can almost eliminate any chance at getting to the root of the patient’s problem.
1) "The inclusion of a single anecdote in a research overview can lead to a reprimand, for reliance on storytelling."
2) "Because clinical observations often do pan out, they serve as lowlevel evidence — especially if they jibe with what basic science suggests is likely. To be sure, this approach, giving weight to the combination of doctors’ experience and biological plausibility, stands somewhat in conflict with the principles of evidencebased medicine"
3) "HERE is where I want to venture a radical statement about the worth of anecdote. Beyond its roles as illustration, affirmation, hypothesisbuilder and lowlevel guidance for practice, storytelling can act as a modest counterbalance to a straitened understanding of evidence."
This is the Abstract of “California at Risk: Vulnerabilities for Transgender Individuals in Southern California."