Image test
Critical Commentary
![Foggy Mountain](/system/files/styles/pece_thumbnail/private/artifacts/media/image/foggy_mountain.jpg?itok=vsho3CxF)
pece_annotation_1472858710
Alexi MartinAnnotation of
In response to
The central argument/narrative of the film is explaining what the Fukishima nuclear meltdown was and what was done to contain the explosions and the subsquent radiation that was leaking into the atmosphere. How to restore power to the plant in order to contain the fuel rods and prevent meltdown. Indirectly the argument was to persuade the public to be more informed about nuclear power and the affects it could have on the world- to learn how to prevent nuclear disasters; make emergency nuclear response teams.
pece_annotation_1479080729
Alexi MartinAnnotation of
In response to
The study was not funded it was on a volunteer basis, where particpiants would be paid for their time and information gathered would be used for the study.
Doloremque diamlorem incidunt, repellendus expedita?