I researched WHO. They missed an oppritunity to title their "About Us" page 'Who, we are'
I researched growing concerns on pathogenicity and mutating diseases.
I researched referenced food issues that have occured relating to health.
This report was produce by compiling historical events and vignettes of the investigation process following several prolific tragedies. They are compared, and conclusions are drawn about similar aspects that muddle investigation following one of these tragedies.
They have a projects and a research division. The whole program primarily consists of MDs and PhDs. They seem to focus their problems on specific issues that affect a great portion of the population.
The event of a disaster as well as the confusion and stress of the aftermath and long term recovery and socioeconomic factors lead to a specific mental health disorder referred to as Chronic Disaster Syndrom.
Substance abuse post-disaster
Comorbidity of mental disorders
Post-disaster social support systems
It defines and provides provisions for Intitutes of Mental Disorders where public mental health would be addressed. It also allows for pay exclusion to those of certain ages, allowing for more treatment to those that may be more at-risk.
This policy is a federal policy and applies to all first responders in the United States.
Not more than what was already discussed, the bibliography was commonly used to back history and stratedgies.
The main point of the article is to explain the history of the vignette or anecdotes in clinical research as an accompaniment to data and analysis, particularly in the realm of psychological medicine. The author makes a case for the importance of the clinical vignette, explaining how it can assist physicians in diagnosing and treating patients.
It was produced and published by WHO, but I don't have an opinion developed enough to learn anything from that. It is a well known name.