test
...
Editing with Contributor
...
Editing with Contributor
Andrew Rosenthal created this pie chart as part of the Energy in COVID-19 working group’s October Research Brief.
Critical Commentary
...
Editing with Researcher user
test
One argument presented is that public engagement in technical decisions can lead to great vigilance and confidence in emergency preparedness and that decisions governing technologies should not be left to the scientist. There is benefit in including lay people and STS scholars. This also includes public awareness about emergency response instead of one elite governing body controlling what is best for the public. Nuclear emergency responses must be transparent.
The students who complete the program receive a PhD after either 4 or 5 years, as described above
The report consists of the main article followed by a response from Andrea Binder of the Global Public Policy Institute.
Doloremque diamlorem incidunt, repellendus expedita?