Image test
Critical Commentary
pece_annotation_1473109683
josh.correiraOne argument presented is that public engagement leads to increased vigilance and emergency preparedness. Nuclear emergency response should not be governed by one elite body of scientists. Information should be crowd sourced from the public to increase awareness and transparency and lead to more ideas as well as public support. Another argument presented is that risk prevention has historically been the focus of governing bodies instead of risk acceptance and emergency response. A nuclear reactor being placed near the ocean is more fiscally responsible but natural disasters are unavoidable, regardless of the amount of risk prevention that has been taken. Instead, the focus should be on emergency response after natural disaster strikes. Safety is also sometimes substituted for profitability.
pece_annotation_1473112342
josh.correiraI have not found any opinions in the news about the program but several other educational institutions have released announcements about the program appearing to be advertisements.
Doloremque diamlorem incidunt, repellendus expedita?